Facing South

Uranium mining in Virginia?

va_uranium_map.jpgA company that wants to mine radioactive uranium in rural Virginia
successfully lobbied a state commission for a study of the
matter after the legislature refused over public health concerns.

Members
of the Virginia Coal and Energy Commission unanimously approved a motion [pdf] last month asking the Virginia Center for
Coal and Energy Research at Virginia Tech to join with the National
Academy of Sciences "or other comparable scientific or academic
institutions" to study the impact of uranium mining in the state. The
motion also calls for public hearings on the practice, which Virginia
has banned for the past 25 years.

The study was requested by Virginia Uranium, a privately held
company seeking to overturn the state ban so it can mine and mill
uranium for nuclear power plants on a 200-acre site near the farming community of Coles Hill in Virginia's Pittsylvania County. The
site lies just north of the City of Danville, Va. and near the
border with North Carolina's Rockingham and Caswell counties.

Formed two years ago, Virginia Uranium belongs mostly -- 78% -- to
the Coles and Bowen families that own the farmland where the uranium
was found three decades ago. Private investors hold another 12% of the
company, while employees, managers and directors own 10%.

The Pittsylvania County site is believed to represent the largest
undeveloped uranium deposit in the United States and the seventh
largest in the world. It holds an estimated 60,000 tons -- enough
uranium to power all the commercial nuclear power plants in the country
for about two years.

The company estimates the ore's long-term value at about $10 billion.

COMPANY CONTRIBUTED TO COMMISSION MEMBERS WHO OK'D STUDY

Democratic
Gov. Tim Kaine supports a uranium mining study, which also won the
approval of the state's Democratic-controlled Senate. But the Republican-led
House defeated the proposal after hearing the concerns of a GOP
delegate who represents constituents that get their drinking water from
the targeted area.

As the Washington Post observes, Virginia
lawmakers' comfort with uranium mining seems to increase with their
distance from it:

The issue
divided legislators along geographic lines rather than partisan ones.
Many who represent areas where uranium has been found or whose drinking
water could be affected voted against it, and many from other regions,
including Northern Virginia, voted for it. The Coles Hill area supplies
drinking water locally and to parts of Hampton Roads and North Carolina.

Virginia Uranium has vigorously lobbied state legislators to support the
study. During the last legislative session, the company paid almost
$100,000 to 15 lobbyists to try to get the uranium mining study
approved, according to the Virginia Public Access
Project
. When those efforts didn't work, the company pursued
the study through the Coal and Energy Commission, whose members are
appointed by the state House and Senate leadership and the governor.

Several members of the commission that approved the study also
received campaign contributions from Virginia Uranium, VPAP data shows. The
Commission's vice chair, state Sen. John Watkins of Richmond, got
$1,000 on June 11. Other commission members who took contributions from
the company were state Senate President Pro Tem Charles Colgan of
Manassas ($1,000 on June 30), Sen. Frank Wagner of Virginia Beach
($2,000 on June 10), and Delegate Timothy Hugo of Fairfax County (two
$500 installments on Jan. 4 and Jan. 8).

In all, Virginia Uranium contributed almost $30,000 to Virginia state legislators this year.

A LEGACY OF DISEASE AND DEATH

Company
officials say they believe the Pittsylvania County uranium can be mined
safely. Other proponents of the plan have gone so far as to dismiss
worries about uranium mining as exaggerated. They include Max Schulz, a
senior fellow with the free-market Manhattan Institute and a former
speechwriter for U.S. Energy Secretaries Samuel Bodman and Spencer
Abraham, who penned an opinion piece for the Wall Street
Journal
in which he called uranium mining "relatively harmless":

Handled properly, the yellowcake
that is extracted is no more hazardous than regular household chemicals
(and unlike coal, it won't smolder and combust).

James Kelly,
who directed the nuclear engineering program at the University of
Virginia for many years, says that fears about uranium mining are
wildly overblown. "It's an aesthetic nightmare, but otherwise safe in
terms of releasing any significant radioactivity or pollution," he told
me. "It would be ugly to look at, but from the perspective of any
hazard I wouldn't mind if they mined across the street from me."

But the record shows that uranium mining is not as
environmentally benign as Schulz would have us believe. While it's true
that the yellowcake ore is not as radioactive as processed
uranium, the way in which it's extracted from the earth and turned
into a useable product has a record of creating serious health problems for miners as well as nearby communities, including:

* Chromosome abnormalities in residents of Karnes
County, Texas, where uranium was mined commercially starting in the
1950s;

* An increase in birth defects in babies
born to mothers who lived near a uranium mine waste dump in New Mexico;

* Excess risk of cancer mortality in communities near uranium mills in Spain; and

* An increase in lung cancer risk for residents living near uranium mines in Germany.

Uranium
mining also presents a serious threat to drinking water, as illustrated
by the disaster that took place at Church Rock, N.M. in
1979, just 14 weeks after the Three Mile Island nuclear accident.

On
July 16 of that year, at a uranium mining and milling complex owned by
the Virginia-based United Nuclear Corporation, a state-of-the-art dam
holding uranium mining waste burst, sending more than 1,100 tons of
the toxic discards known as "tailings" and 90 million gallons of
contaminated liquid into the Rio Puerco River. Once an important
drinking water source for nearby Navajo communities, the river remains
dangerously contaminated today.

Uranium mining's impact on drinking water is a concern for Virginia
as well -- especially given a climate far wetter than the desert
Southwest. In Virginia Beach, for example, officials recently announced their opposition to the mining plan over
concerns that a tropical storm or hurricane could breach the mine waste
impoundments, polluting downstream waterways including Lake Gaston, the
city's drinking water source.

Environmental groups also oppose the uranium mining plans for
Virginia. They include the Southern Environmental Law Center, Piedmont
Environmental Council, Southside Concerned Citizens, the Virginia
Conservation Network and the Sierra Club.

(Map showing location of proposed uranium mine from Virginia Uranium's website)

Tags:

People Referenced:

Comments

re: Uranium mining in Virginia?

There were no significant increases in Karnes County for any cancer when comparisons were made with either the US population, the State of Texas or the control counties. In particular, deaths due to cancers of the lung, bone, liver and kidney were not more frequent in Karnes County than in the control counties.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003JRP....23..247B

re: Uranium mining in Virginia?

This may be true, but the amount of swampland in southern VA still leaves me leary of the very real possibility of radioactive material being released into the abundant groundwater. I can see a potential for this material to work its way eastward (the direction of much of the water flow in this region) to more populated areas in the Norfolk/VA Beach area.

re: Uranium mining in Virginia?

No wonder this idiot writes as "anonymous". To doubt the reasons for caution in this most dangerous of proposals, yet, in the same sentence, admit that radioactive waste could travel onward toward more populated areas of the countryside, is typical of the maddness I've seen and noted in becomming involved in studying this issue. I am out of the closet where this issue is concerned, and ready to "do battle" over my personal quality of life for me and my friends here in southside Va.

re: Uranium mining in Virginia?

They will destroy much of Virginia and poison an untold number of people, not to mention all of the birth defects. Uranium is not "safe." Nuclear technology has been a horrible thing for humanity and people who think otherwise are either being idealistic or have their piggish eyes set on the profits from this. I live in this region and will not have my children grow up here if this mine goes through. -John