Obama stimulus plan would shrink U.S. carbon footprint
The version of the economic stimulus plan proposed by President Obama could cut U.S. carbon dioxide emissions by at least 61 million metric tons annually -- an impact equivalent to taking 13 million cars off the road.
That's the finding of a new analysis commissioned by the environmental advocacy group Greenpeace and conducted by the Virginia-based consulting firm ICF International. The researchers examined the potential greenhouse gas reductions for the legislation's 16 key energy, environment, technology and highway infrastructure provisions.
"The fact that the federal government could spend so much money and actually help slow global warming means we've really turned the page as a country," said Greenpeace Research Director Kert Davies. "This is a real sign that we're starting to move beyond the era of fossil fuels."
The report found that the $2.5 billion proposed for energy efficiency upgrades to homes could reduce carbon emissions by 7.3 million metric tons and save $1.25 billion in annual utility costs, while a proposed $6.9 billion investment to help state and local governments become more energy efficient could generate $3 billion in savings each year and cut carbon emissions by over 20 million tons annually. But if the transportation portion of the bill focuses on new highway construction instead of road repair or public transit, the carbon emission reductions would themselves be reduced by up to 5 million tons annually.
However, it appear increasingly unlikely that the version of the stimulus plan proposed by President Obama will make it through the Senate, where centrist lawmakers in both parties are working to strip as much as $200 billion from the almost $900 billion package, the New York Times reports. The Senate expects to vote on its version of the plan later today.
The House already passed its own version of the stimulus package. For an Associated Press comparison of the House plan and the original Senate proposal, click here.
Categories:
Tags:
Comments
re: Obama stimulus plan would shrink U.S. carbon footprint
By reviewing previous studies on carbon emmisions around the country it is obvious that the large areas in the west and northern midwest with the corresponding agricultural land and forested land that are not creating any carbon footprint that the U.S. is actually carbon neutral at this time. Any money spent on trying to reduce carbon emmisions will be wasted and make the U.S. less competitive in the world while driving our debt higher and higher.
re: Obama stimulus plan would shrink U.S. carbon footprint
I'd be interested in seeing the supporting data for Art's claim that the U.S. is somehow carbon neutral because of its agricultural lands. In fact, industrial agriculture is very carbon intensive. As noted food author Michael Pollan put it last year in an open letter to the next president, "when we eat from the industrial-food system, we are eating oil and spewing greenhouse gases."
Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter for the latest news, trends & analysis.
Archives
- February 2012 (9)
- January 2012 (34)
- December 2011 (27)
- November 2011 (36)
- October 2011 (36)
- September 2011 (41)
- August 2011 (42)
- July 2011 (29)
- June 2011 (39)
- May 2011 (37)
- April 2011 (30)
- March 2011 (38)
- February 2011 (22)
News Tips
Have a news tip? Email us.
Categories
Other Websites
- MEDIA
- Center for Public Integrity
- ColorLines
- Daily Yonder
- Grist
- New America Media
- ProPublica
- Southern Political Report
- Southern Spaces
- Stateline
- POLICY AND RESEARCH
- Applied Research Center
- Center for American Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- Center for Rural Strategies
- Economic Policy Institute
- Highlander Research and Education Center
- Progressive States Network
- Southern Alliance for Clean Energy
- SouthNow



