POWER POLITICS: The South proves a harsh environment for the climate bill
The U.S. House of Representatives approved a landmark climate bill on Friday, passing the American Clean Energy and Security Act by a narrow 219-212 margin. The measure, which would set caps on greenhouse gas emissions and boost renewable energy and efficiency, now goes to the Senate.
If the House vote is any indication, the legislation can be expected to face significant opposition from Senators hailing from the coal-dependent South.
While lawmakers from the region's 13 states* constituted 32% of all those who took part in the June 26 vote on the bill, they represented 46% of those who voted against the legislation and only 19% of those who approved it. Less than a third of all Southern lawmakers -- 30% -- voted for the measure.
Southerners also constituted 46% of those Democrats who crossed party lines to vote against the bill, but none of the eight Republicans who crossed the other way were from the South. (It should be noted that three Democrats -- Peter DeFazio of Oregon, Dennis Kucinich of Ohio and Pete Stark of California -- voted against the bill because they felt it didn't go far enough.)
Perhaps the South's hostility to the climate bill is not entirely surprising given its politics: The region was a stronghold of support for Republican John McCain in last November's elections, with 10 of the 13 Southern states voting against Democrat Barack Obama. And as an analysis of the climate bill vote by the National Journal found:
In both parties, nothing appeared to drive the outcome more than the presidential result in last November's election.
Republicans from districts that backed McCain voted against the bill 141 to 1, according to the National Journal, with a lawmaker from New Jersey the only "aye." Two other McCain Republicans did not take part in the vote. Meanwhile, of the 49 House Democrats from districts that voted for McCain, 29 voted against the measure.
On the other hand, only 15 of the 207 Democrats from districts that Obama carried last year voted against the bill, according to the National Journal. Florida Democratic Rep. Alcee Hastings, who hails from a strongly pro-Obama district, was among the three members who did not vote on the bill; as the co-chair of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, he was in Albania on Friday as an election observer.
Of these 15 no-voting "Obama Democrats," six were from the South: Glenn Nye of Virginia, Larry Kissell of North Carolina, Ciro Rodriguez and Solomon Ortiz of Texas, John Barrow of Georgia and Artur Davis of Alabama.
Interestingly, all of the states that the no-voting Southern Democrats were from except for Texas are coal states -- that is, states that rely on coal to generate at least 40% of their electricity. Of the 30 coal states, nine are in the South: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia. The National Journal's analysis found that 30 of the 44 Democrats who voted against the bill hailed from coal states:
That means about one-in-four of the coal state Democrats voted no, compared to only a little over one-in-10 of everyone else.
Of course, the economy of Texas is heavily dependent on another fossil fuel -- oil. So is the economy of Louisiana, where no members of Congress voted in favor of the climate bill.
The debate now moves to the Senate, where the influence of the industries with the most to lose in the transition to a clean-energy future -- and the lawmakers from states most deeply beholden to them -- will undoubtedly continue the fight against efforts to curb greenhouse gas pollution.
* AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV
Categories:
Tags:
Comments
re: POWER POLITICS: The South proves a harsh environment for the
In the south we understand that it gets warm every summer without fail. We understand that Mother Nature is more powerful than any of us or all of us combined. Any time she feels like it she will kick our ass.
re: POWER POLITICS: The South proves a harsh environment for the
Many local government officials from Florida, Arkansas, North Carolina and Texas and elsewhere in the South, like those from across the country, have their communities working to combat climate change and recognize the need for this legislation. The south has already suffered from extraordinary droughts and and some very severe storms. Climate and weather are not synonymous but the people of the south, like all the people of the United States recognize now is the time to end our dependence on foreign oil and work to protect our common natural heritage for future generations.
re: POWER POLITICS: The South proves a harsh environment for the
The excellent report from the US Global Change Research Program, available at www.globalchange.gov, shows that the South is exceptionally vulnerable to the harmful effects of climate change. Southern politicians need to lead the fight against global warming pollution.
re: POWER POLITICS: The South proves a harsh environment for the
Worth checking out these issue briefs and fact sheets as well:
http://www.wri.org/publication/southeast-energy-policy
Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter for the latest news, trends & analysis.
Archives
- May 2012 (25)
- April 2012 (33)
- March 2012 (36)
- February 2012 (32)
- January 2012 (34)
- December 2011 (27)
- November 2011 (36)
- October 2011 (36)
- September 2011 (41)
- August 2011 (42)
- July 2011 (29)
- June 2011 (39)
- May 2011 (9)
News Tips
Have a news tip? Email us.
Categories
Other Websites
- MEDIA
- Center for Public Integrity
- ColorLines
- Daily Yonder
- Grist
- New America Media
- ProPublica
- Southern Political Report
- Southern Spaces
- Stateline
- POLICY AND RESEARCH
- Applied Research Center
- Center for American Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- Center for Rural Strategies
- Economic Policy Institute
- Highlander Research and Education Center
- Progressive States Network
- Southern Alliance for Clean Energy



