Were GOP senators looking at home-state demographics in softening on Sotomayor?

Many of the senate Republicans expected to lead the attack against Judge Sonia Sotomayor's nomination for the Supreme Court ended up backpedaling and even endorsing her. How did that happen?

An NPR report today echoes what others have been saying -- that it was at least partially a calculation about election politics, especially as 2010 contests loom near:

Three centrist Republicans announced they'd support Sotomayor even as
the Senate's minority leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said
he'd vote no. The split was a vivid reflection of the divisions in the
GOP as the party faces a tricky vote on Sotomayor, wary of alienating
its conservative base but equally afraid to anger Hispanic and women
voters.

Facing South has often reported on the political implications of the South's rapidly-growing Latino population, and it's an especially interesting factor to consider in this week's Sotomayor debate.

It's clear that many of the GOP senators who toned-down their opposition or came to  endorse Sotomayor come from states deeply affected by Latino immigration -- and where Latinos are seeing growing clout in politics. Consider this map from the Pew Hispanic Center, charting the states with the most rapid Hispanic growth:

Pew Latino.jpg 

Southern states like Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas have seen some of the biggest gains in the country.

Now consider how GOP senators from these states are lining up on Sotomayor, according to NPR:

* Sen. Mel Martinez (FL) -- Will vote for Sotomayor
* Sen. Jeff Sessions (AL) -- Sees "no reason" to hold up Sotomayor vote
* Sens. Lindsey Graham (SC) and John Cornyn (TX) are now calling Sotomayor's voting record "mainstream"

By contrast, the two Senate Republicans still expressing strong opposition are Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Sen. Robert Bennett of Utah -- two states that haven't been affected nearly as much by the growth of new immigrant and Latino communities.

Surely, a host of factors have been in play during the confirmation hearings. But it seems likely that one of them were GOP senators sizing up the political costs of fighting the Supreme Court's first Hispanic nominee

Share this
0
Your rating: None

Categories:

Tags:

Comments

re: Were GOP senators looking at home-state demographics in soft

The map showing the counites with high growth rates in the Latino population are pretty much the demographically dynamic counties of the nation as a whole. This means that the growth of the white and other GOP leaning segments of the population in these counties it high, too.The charge that the GOP is pandering to Latinos on Sot-Mayor in these areas simply not supported.

It is possible that the GOP is not demagouging on the Soto-Mayor nomination, but expressing real doubts based on principle.

More likely, the GOP sees, after four decades of pushing hard rigth conservative activists into the judiciary that the tide has turned and that they have to shut off the possibility of liberal judicial by claiming a new found loyalty to principles of judicial neutrality.