Among the key elections around the South yesterday was a runoff race for a school board seat in Wake County, N.C., home to the state capital of Raleigh -- the outcome of which many fear could lead to racial re-segregation.

The Wake County school system -- the largest in North Carolina and the 18th largest nationally -- has gotten notice for innovative integration efforts that since 2000 have relied not on race but on income levels reported by families on applications for federally subsidized lunches, with the system aiming for a maximum concentration of 40% low-income students at any one school.
A recent book by Syracuse University professor Gerald Grant titled "Hope and Despair in the American City: Why There Are No Bad Schools in Raleigh" compares Raleigh, where the high-performing school system has contributed to increased prosperity across the metro area, to Syracuse, where a troubled school system has complicated urban revitalization efforts.
As Grant -- whose grandchildren attend Raleigh schools -- told the Independent Weekly newspaper in an interview earlier this year:
Meanwhile, the N.C. Association of Educators, the Wake County Democratic Party and an alliance of community leaders and businessmen supported the diversity policy. They pointed in warning to the Charlotte-Mecklenburg school system, where a court order ended the racial diversity policy in 2002, resulting in rapid re-segregation as well as significantly lower test scores overall than Wake County's.
Last month, elections were held for four officially nonpartisan seats on Wake County's nine-member board. In order to change the diversity policy, opposition candidates needed to win all four seats, which are elected by district. In the October race, three of the anti-busing candidates won outright -- and the fourth won by a landslide in yesterday's runoff.
But the new board could face a legal battle if it tries to end the system's diversity policy.
The N.C. NAACP warned that it may sue in order to force Wake County to continue its integration efforts. At a rally held last week in support of school diversity, Rev. William Barber, the civil-rights group's president, said that creating high-poverty, segregated schools is "nothing more than a form of institutional child abuse."
John Tedesco -- the anti-busing candidate and New Jersey transplant who won yesterday's runoff -- has said that the new coalition of board members has no intention of re-segregating the schools. But given the stark realities of how race and class figure into housing patterns, that would undoubtedly be the result of a return to neighborhood schools.
The Wake County school system -- the largest in North Carolina and the 18th largest nationally -- has gotten notice for innovative integration efforts that since 2000 have relied not on race but on income levels reported by families on applications for federally subsidized lunches, with the system aiming for a maximum concentration of 40% low-income students at any one school.
A recent book by Syracuse University professor Gerald Grant titled "Hope and Despair in the American City: Why There Are No Bad Schools in Raleigh" compares Raleigh, where the high-performing school system has contributed to increased prosperity across the metro area, to Syracuse, where a troubled school system has complicated urban revitalization efforts.
As Grant -- whose grandchildren attend Raleigh schools -- told the Independent Weekly newspaper in an interview earlier this year:
Essentially, the book argues that Raleigh tore down the wall when they merged the county and city school systems back in 1976. The research is very clear that having the right mix of kids socioeconomically, as Wake County does, has enormous benefits for poor kids without hurting rich kids.But Wake County relies in part on busing students to create and maintain diversity in the classroom -- and that has sparked outspoken opposition from many parents who complained about the need to reassign thousands of children to different schools from year to year. With the help of local Republicans, they founded several political action committees to back candidates that oppose the busing policy and support a return to neighborhood schools.
Meanwhile, the N.C. Association of Educators, the Wake County Democratic Party and an alliance of community leaders and businessmen supported the diversity policy. They pointed in warning to the Charlotte-Mecklenburg school system, where a court order ended the racial diversity policy in 2002, resulting in rapid re-segregation as well as significantly lower test scores overall than Wake County's.
Last month, elections were held for four officially nonpartisan seats on Wake County's nine-member board. In order to change the diversity policy, opposition candidates needed to win all four seats, which are elected by district. In the October race, three of the anti-busing candidates won outright -- and the fourth won by a landslide in yesterday's runoff.
But the new board could face a legal battle if it tries to end the system's diversity policy.
The N.C. NAACP warned that it may sue in order to force Wake County to continue its integration efforts. At a rally held last week in support of school diversity, Rev. William Barber, the civil-rights group's president, said that creating high-poverty, segregated schools is "nothing more than a form of institutional child abuse."
John Tedesco -- the anti-busing candidate and New Jersey transplant who won yesterday's runoff -- has said that the new coalition of board members has no intention of re-segregating the schools. But given the stark realities of how race and class figure into housing patterns, that would undoubtedly be the result of a return to neighborhood schools.




I would like to point out that one of the leaders to segregate Wake County schools was NC SEIU Executive Director Dana Cope.
This is a shameful betrayal of SEIU's mission to advance working class families. It is astounding to me that he would still be entrusted with the stewardship of our movement after attacking the very principle of equality in education.
More info here
November 4, 2009 12:37 PM | Reply
The people of Wake County have spoken. You had your little speech and from what I've read, quite inspiring and Martin Luther Kingish.... But 75% of Wake County say bring back neighborhood schools. Doesnt sound racial to me. But then again, the very group you represent are at the top of the Race Card players.. The naacp.. Colored People?? Funny how when I use the word colored, its wrong. But ya'll can have a whole organization.. Anyway, lose with dignity Bro. Willy and pick a fight you have a chance of winning.
November 4, 2009 5:35 PM | Reply
"The people of Wake County have spoken"? Uh, no. The four districts in play in this election were in largely white suburban areas of the county. My own largely black neighborhood in Raleigh did not get a chance to speak this time around. But K. Pearce does offer us useful insight into the mindset of the anti-diversity crowd. Note the disrespect for Rev. Barber and the NAACP. Talk about dignity.
November 4, 2009 11:16 PM | Reply
Yeah, NAACP has been a backbone for many programs and civil rights manners, and being unsure of the context "colored" give you something more to study in life. Raleigh has been trying desperately to reorganize in a way that would re-segregate the city. The community decides and if it's not suitable, speak up or move out. Why not pay attention to the results which is "increased test scores"... that's what we want. Having a dominant school so 10 other schools can suck, isn't the way to go. Democrats have been pushing some great agenda's and it seems Republicans just play defense to protect their luxurious assets. Time to raise the bar and fight poverty! With the recession there is plenty at the bottom, so fall down alone or stand up the less fortunate. It's time to put your preconceived judgment to the side and stand up for those who need a helping hand, even diverse groups.
November 4, 2009 11:47 PM | Reply
You might want to check out the just released test scores for Wake and CMS. It seems that CMS is doing a better job than Wake at educating poor and minority students. We're all waiting to hear the explanation for why busing is still better.
November 7, 2009 9:11 AM | Reply