VOICES: Workers who win the South change the nation
Forty-seven years after the 1963 March on Washington, the union movement and our allies are preparing for our own march in October. Under the banner of One Nation Working Together, union members, civil rights activists and other concerned citizens will rally in support of good jobs, a quality education for every child, immigration reform and workers' freedom to form a union. Our rallying cry is that we must reverse the dangerous trend toward greater income inequality and finally create an economy that works for all.
To achieve that goal and to become a truly united nation working together, leaders of the One Nation coalition partners -- particularly our nation's labor leaders -- could learn a valuable lesson from that earlier march on Washington: The road to justice and equality must go through the South.
During the 1963 march, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently illustrated this point when he said:
"Let freedom ring from the mountains of New York ... Pennsylvania ... Colorado ... California. But not only that: Let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia ... from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee ... from every hill and molehill of Mississippi ... let freedom ring."
Civil rights leaders knew the only way to win freedom for people of color everywhere was to win it first in the most difficult place -- the segregated South. That's why community activists boycotted buses in Montgomery, college students staged sit-ins in Greensboro and sanitation workers walked out in Memphis. Dr. King and other leaders understood that if they could change policies in the heart of Jim Crow, then they could change laws nationally. And they did.
More than four decades later, national labor leaders should heed Dr. King's prophetic words. If we want to strengthen the rights of workers everywhere, then we must organize workers in the South.
The southern United States is the center for exploitation of workers of all colors. Employees in the South have the lowest wages, the fewest worker protections and the least union representation. And nowhere are the harmful effects of globalization and flawed trade deals more evident than in the South.
My hometown of Hickory, N.C., has lost more jobs due to trade than just about anywhere else in the country. Laid-off workers there can receive free tuition for re-training at the local community college. But many question the point. The furniture factories and hosiery mills are all boarded up, casualties of NAFTA and CAFTA. Why enroll in training if you'll just end up working at Wal-Mart or the local mall?
One would think that workers in Hickory and other southern towns have been shortchanged for so long that they would stand up and demand that elected officials finally look out for their interests. But instead, the South keeps re-electing policymakers who support trade deals that harm workers, who oppose wage protections and who vote time and again against workers' interests. Keep in mind that these votes hurt all workers, not just Southerners.
If we want a more worker-friendly Congress, then workers in the South need to believe that change is possible. That's hard to do in places like Hickory, where there is no voice to counter what folks hear on talk radio. There is no union organizing workers. There is no central labor council mobilizing people for collective action. There are no canvassers from Working America talking to folks about taking our country back from the CEOs and Big Banks. Unions have largely chosen not to invest in the South, and as a result, there is no labor movement in many areas to challenge the status quo.
I have heard national labor leaders say that we are at a critical moment in our movement, and that to grow, we must convince the public that we are the voice for all workers. If that's true, then we must win the hearts and minds of workers in my hometown and small towns across the South. Because if we don't, we will see the violent union-busting and repressive laws of the South spread throughout the country.
The good news is, with the will and the resources, we can change the South. Thanks to an influx of resources in 2008, North Carolina elected a pro-worker U.S. senator, and our state went "blue" in the presidential election for the first time since 1976.
Workers at the world's largest pork slaughterhouse, Smithfield Packing Co. in Tar Heel, N.C., felt so empowered by our electoral victories that one month later, in December 2008, they finally won their union after 16 long years of struggle. The workers, the majority of whom are people of color, had a slogan leading up to the union election: "We won the White House so we can win the hog house." And they did.
That victory was possible because 1) a union was willing to make a long-term investment in organizing and 2) the workers believed that change was possible. We could have many more victories like the one at Smithfield. But first, national labor leaders have to invest in organizing campaigns throughout the South.
During the 1963 march, Dr. King outlined his dream of racial equality. I too have a dream -- a dream that one day, even in North Carolina, the least unionized state in the country, all workers will have good jobs and the freedom to organize and bargain collectively.
I believe that dream can come true. I believe that workers can change the South and, by doing so, change the country. If only I could get the leaders of the union movement to believe it, too.
MaryBe McMillan is secretary-treasurer of the North Carolina State AFL-CIO and a former Institute for Southern Studies board member.
Tags:
Comments
re: VOICES: Workers who win the South change the nation
How can anyone who is member of an American labor union support this administration? Going Green dose not work with Globalization or American labor jobs.
Economic Globalization requires the movement of goods and unfortunately this is being allowed in our waters by mostly foreign ships according to a report prepared for congress in DEC 2009 without Federal laws to protect our waters from the pollution of ballast dumping. There is also a huge carbon footprint these ships present. Manufacturing jobs are created where cost are lower. If international shipping was held accountable for water pollution and the carbon footprint caused, bringing foreign goods into our country, their cost would rise and could allow us to be cost effective producers again. The following is from a report prepared for congress in DEC 2009
“Although estimates of the costs of ballast treatment may be imprecise and vary from vessel to
vessel, there is some general agreement on average costs.14 For example, it may cost an estimated
$400,000 per vessel for modification of container/bulk vessels to use onshore ballast water
treatment facilities at California ports. More generally, the cost of retrofitting vessels to treat
ballast water has been estimated at between $200,000 and $310,000 per vessel for mechanical
treatment and around $300,000 for chemical treatment.15 Most of this expense will be borne by
foreign shipping companies, as the U.S. flag fleet is a small percentage of the global fleet,16 and
likely passed along to consumers of products imported on these ships.”
Until the media,unions,manufactures,health professionals, inform the general public about jobs lost, the human health effects of water borne virus, human pathogens, and invasive’s, ballast water presents, bringing foreign goods into our country while taking Americans jobs, or the terrorist threat it presents, the Senate will not act. Action creating national ballast water legislation, would curtail the "vision of economic globalization" as the answer to help the American economy. They will not admit this policy of economic globalization, has flaws despite the continued destruction of our environment by foreign economic interest. So far all we can hope for under this administration is delay by another study,and a two decade plan by the Coast Guard to address invasive’s, while delegating out the pollution, by other materials, and the terrorist threat ballast system pose, to several branches of government without any infrastructure to enforce. Unfortunately they know that not being a comprehensive plan it will not be adequate and will be able to be circumvented by industry. Preventing chemicals, like rat poison used by sea captains to kill invasive’s will not be possible, by the EPA through Clean Water Act as they do not have infrastructure for enforcement. This was recently apparent by the lack of enforcement during the Gulf disaster allowing ballast systems to move tar balls into Lake Pontchartrain, despite this administration having been repeatedly warned that release of material through ocean development would allow ballast system to spread it. They continue to force states to spend enormous amounts of money to create state laws, that pit, competition among the states negotiating with foreign shipping, without the states having an infrastructure for enforcement. Perhaps if the American worker and the American labor unions understood this problem and withheld their support for this administration, they would then understand the need to direct the Senate to address the frivolous states rights issue of one Senator Boxer over her alleged belief that national legislation would hinder her states right to tougher laws. She killed the bi-partisan legislation, passed by the house 395-7 for the change we needed in 2008. Economic Americanization will only take president over economic globalization if our elected leaders realize they will be out of office if they do not put our country first. Putting America first can not be done by this administrations plan to negotiate hidden carbon emissions and currency manipulation with a communist country while limiting US carbon emissions, and while allowing foreign shipping to destroy our economy and environment bringing cheap foreign manufactured goods into our country.
re: VOICES: Workers who win the South change the nation
If our country created national ballast water legislation, it would have a ripple affect in saving human life around the world, as IMO sea captains may be more inclined to use technology if it were on board while in counties without any way to enforce the ineffective ocean flush. Waterborne disease in third world countries that rely on the sea for their food, could be curtailed, charity money for vaccines and medicine would have greater impact as needless illness could be prevented. To use the phrase economic globalization is giving the concept of producing and moving goods around the world for global economic development of 3rd world countries, more a place of respect as a concept than it is. Globalization of ideas, culture, education are great to help eliminate misunderstandings and exchange of knowledge, but the plan that boosting foreign economies, helping them develop strong exporting economies at the expense of our countries quality of life and environment is no more than the results of two decades of political dynasty's using it as a way to create revenue for their political origins and their agendas. This is being done while putting the foundations of our countries core values and economy in peril by interlacement of our free economic beliefs with a communist countries controlled economic policy. To be dependent on a country to support our currency so our politicians can offer entitlements for votes, when the country we depend on dose not have an ideology that supports any of our ideals, is allowing them to have a indirect say in our political process. (We can never be considered a free country as long as another country holds our purse strings) In other words the impact on peoples life through a policy of ECONOMIC globalization is about greed, rather than understanding. Our country with it diverse population, is already an experiment of cultural Globalization, that currently can not supply enough jobs for its own people. We need national ballast water to be considered as the law of the land, and not considered as the International Law of the Sea.
Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter for the latest news, trends & analysis.
Archives
- February 2012 (14)
- January 2012 (34)
- December 2011 (27)
- November 2011 (36)
- October 2011 (36)
- September 2011 (41)
- August 2011 (42)
- July 2011 (29)
- June 2011 (39)
- May 2011 (37)
- April 2011 (30)
- March 2011 (38)
- February 2011 (15)
News Tips
Have a news tip? Email us.
Categories
Other Websites
- MEDIA
- Center for Public Integrity
- ColorLines
- Daily Yonder
- Grist
- New America Media
- ProPublica
- Southern Political Report
- Southern Spaces
- Stateline
- POLICY AND RESEARCH
- Applied Research Center
- Center for American Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- Center for Rural Strategies
- Economic Policy Institute
- Highlander Research and Education Center
- Progressive States Network
- Southern Alliance for Clean Energy
- SouthNow



