Facing South
Facing South

Corporations are the real moochers

By Phil Mattera, Dirt Diggers Digest

The firestorm over Mitt Romney's closed-door comments depicting nearly half the U.S. population as parasites is coming mainly from those defending seniors, the poor and the disabled. But what's really wrong with the Ayn Rand worldview Romney was parroting is that it ignores those who are the biggest moochers of all: giant corporations.

If, as Romney suggested, moocherism begins with the failure to pay federal income taxes, then that label can easily be applied to many of the country's major companies. A November 2011 report by Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found that more than one-quarter of large companies paid zero taxes in at least one of the three years examined.

Quite a few of those companies arranged their affairs so that they had negative tax rates, meaning that the IRS sends them checks. And many of those that paid taxes did so at what CTJ and ITEP called "ultra low" rates of 10 percent or less.

Corporate tax avoidance is just the beginning of the story. The dependence on government that has Romney so upset is at the heart of the business plan for much of Corporate America. What libertarian types tend to overlook is that much of the public spending they disdain comes in the form of purchases from businesses. It's estimated that more than $500 billion a year in federal outlays occurs via private-sector contracts.

Some companies rely so heavily on that spending that they are as government-dependent as any Medicaid or food stamp recipient. Aerospace giant Lockheed Martin, for example, derives more than 80 percent of its revenue from the federal government, especially the Pentagon; for its competitor Raytheon the figure is about 75 percent.

A large portion of what is called entitlement spending, especially in healthcare, ends up in the pockets of corporations, including drug makers, medical device manufacturers and for-profit hospital chains. The largest of the latter, HCA, gets more than 40 percent of its revenue from Medicare and Medicaid.

Corporations can get federal grants as well as contracts. The Commerce and Agriculture Departments have a slew of programs that assist businesses in marketing their products or that underwrite some of their costs. And, of course, a large portion of the billions paid each year in farm subsidies goes to agribusiness giants rather than family farmers.

Despite the recent Republican demagoguery on Solyndra, targeted federal spending to develop new energy technologies is nothing new. The Recovery Act's billions for solar and wind companies was completely in line with federal programs that have subsidized everything from coal gasification to nuclear power plants. Before the Fukushima Daiichi disaster in Japan, the U.S. government was promoting a loan guarantee program to encourage the construction of a new generation of nukes by major utility companies.

Giant corporations also depend on the federal government to help them sell their goods abroad. The Export-Import Bank of the United States spends more than $30 billion each year providing various forms of insurance, loan guarantees and direct loans for the likes of Boeing, General Electric and Caterpillar. The federal government's Overseas Private Investment Corporation helps U.S. companies do more business offshore by providing political risk insurance and other types of financial assistance.

Another form of corporate dependency on government  is the ability of natural resources companies to operate on public lands and pay either no royalties or artificially low ones. Mining corporations, for example, take advantage of an 1872 law that allows them to extract gold, silver and other hardrock minerals from public lands royalty-free.

Assistance from the federal government can be a matter of life and death for some companies, as in clear in the cases of General Motors and Chrysler as well as the banks that were brought back from the brink by the TARP bailout and then thrived on the influx of billions in essentially free money from the Federal Reserve.

Hearing all the ways in which the federal government makes life easier and more profitable for big business, a newly arrived Martian might expect giant corporations to be grateful boosters of the public sphere. Instead, as we know all too well, most large companies are disdainful of government and are constantly whining about regulation and taxes they can’t avoid paying.

To make things worse, many government-dependent companies are less than honest when it comes to their dealings with the public sector. The Project On Government Oversight's Federal Contractor Misconduct Database identifies hundreds of examples of contract fraud and other offenses. Healthcare providers such as HCA, not satisfied with the vast amount of honest business they get from Medicare and Medicaid, have defrauded taxpayers out of billions more.

If Romney wants to find the real moochers -- and often crooked ones at that -- he can find them in the corporate world that is his natural habitat.

Image: 
Facing South
Facing South
Appreciate this post? Please donate & share below.
Reddit »

Categories:

People Referenced:

Comments

So-Called Entitlements

In the contemporary class war, words are the tricksters' key weapon. By turning their own sense of entitlement into a brand for the targets of their contempt and exploitation, the winners use language to lure the "losers" (as Mitt sees them) into their camp. To a disturbing extent, it works. Progressives need to reject duplicitous speech instead of buying into it, as too often we do. I hear progressives refer to "conservatives" when talking about people like Ryan and Rick Perry. Ridiculous. I'm glad, therefore, to see the insertion of "so-called" in front of "entitlements" here. Let's do more to call into question this sort of deceptive speech. Instead of helping to camouflage these wacky reactionaries by calling them "conservatives," liberals should unmask them as revolutionaries and bigots. Those who imagine the notion of "states' rights" as something more than a bone, thrown by the Founding Fathers' to the reactionaries of their day, are not "originalists"--they are revisionists of the Constitution. Instead of letting the mainstream media parrot racist terminology (such as quoting speech tying the President to a nonexistent plan for "reparations"), those truly left of the flabby center should find ways to "out" the implications of words bought and paid for by elites.

Good and Bad

There's good and bad in every group. Most everybody is taking and being took at the same time. It’s a massive redistribution scheme that makes no one want to give up what he is getting, but everyone wants to stop giving so much. It affects almost everybody so very few want to change, but we are getting to the end of the line where it is all going to collapse.

Rand would stand with you against corporate takers

Her worst villains in "Atlas Shrugged" were crony capitalists - her ultimate villain is an evil Corporate President and worthless heir! Read her for what she wrote, not what the incorrect caricatures are.

Post new comment

You may enter comments here to publicly respond to this article. If you are having trouble posting your comment, please contact Jerimee@southernstudies.org.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Type the characters you see in this picture.
Type the characters you see in the picture; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.  Switch to audio verification.