Headquarters Opposed to Woman Suffrage
North Carolina's restrictive new voting law turns back the clock on women's access to the ballot. (Photo from the Library of Congress.)

The war on women voting in North Carolina

It is well-documented that the heaviest burdens under strict photo voter ID laws fall on African Americans, Latino Americans and those of low income.

Large numbers of people in these groups don’t have cars, so they may not have a driver's license to vote. Many work hours that make it hard to visit a state motor vehicle office to obtain ID. Those same work hours can make it difficult to get to the polls on time on Election Day, which is why early voting is so popular among these groups.

But voter ID laws also disproportionately affect another group: women.

I reported last year in The Nation about the "war on women voting," and that war is still being fought today. We see this with Texas' onerous voter ID law, which entangled state Sen. Wendy Davis and District Court Judge Sandra Watts when they tried to vote in recent elections.

Approved by the legislature earlier this year, North Carolina's photo voter ID law will be implemented in 2016 if it is not stopped by lawsuits claiming it will hamper voting by low-income people and people of color. And there's now evidence that the law, like those in other states, will also present special problems for women.

The Durham, N.C.-based Southern Coalition for Social Justice -- among the parties that have filed lawsuits filed against the state's voter ID law and redistricting plan -- recently analyzed data from the state board of elections. SCSJ found that of the over 318,000 North Carolina voters who lack required ID, 63 percent are women. Looking at the state's own report on those without ID, SCSJ found that 43 percent of registered women voters without photo ID are women of color. African-American women, who made up just over 23 percent of North Carolina's registered female voters in 2012, represented 34 percent of women without ID.

And it’s not just the voter ID provision of North Carolina's law that disproportionately impacts women: so do provisions shrinking the early voting period and eliminating same-day registration.

Over 55 percent of early voters in the state's 2012 general election were women, and African-American women accounted for 31 percent of early voters. The same disproportionate burden on women voters of color results from ending same-day registration. This SCSJ infographic shows the broad impact of North Carolina’s Voter ID law on women:


But it's not just women without photo ID who will face problems voting. Women with ID whose names have been changed due to marriage status could be encumbered or denied under the new law. Given the snafus encountered by women voters this past week in Texas, this is no small concern.

In Texas, if a woman's name on her ID doesn't match her voter registration record in a highly recognizable manner, then she may sign an affidavit swearing to her identity. The Texas Tribune reports that at least 40 percent of early voters in Fort Bend County had to sign affidavits because of name discrepancies. In Travis County, 20 percent of nearly 32,000 early voters signed affidavits, most of them women, according to Travis County Clerk Dana DeBeauvoir.

Sen. Davis, who is running for governor, was among those Texans who had to sign an affidavit to vote. Ironically, it was Davis's last-second amendment to that state's voter ID law that allowed for the affidavit safeguard.

But North Carolina lacks that same safety net. As SCSJ states in their report:

"If North Carolina’s new photo ID requirement goes into effect in 2016, there will be no affidavit option -- if a person's photo ID is not deemed acceptable, that person will simply be turned away from the polls. And the people most likely to have those non-matching documents are women voters."

Image: 
North Carolina's restrictive new voting law turns back the clock on women's access to the ballot. (Photo from the Library of Congress.)
Appreciate this post? Please donate & share below.
Reddit »

People Referenced:

Comments

FEMALE BLOOD in the game

PLZ do some homework, Googling on Chief Justice Ola Moser Lewis. She is a black, female Republican running against the Republican goodoleboy of NC for the states Supreme Court position. Her qualifications are stellar, as good or better than the appointed Chief Justice Mark Martin. In tradition and personal choice, Gov. McCrory gave Mark Martin the PAT on the back to take over the temp job of Supreme Court Chief Justice of NC until he is elected. SO CERTAIN that he will be elected. So, what's the point of the election if this position has already been filled without judicial process? Why would Judge Ola, the underdog, fight? Because she has been put under their thumbs and told, to "Sit down" Don't make waves. Are they intimated by her and if so why? She is very intelligent, a real go getter, not a goodoleboy type or crony. She cannot be bought. No PAC's and insider politics. Her mission is to be a GOOD judge to the NC people. She wants more working days for the courts. as of now they only work about one day a month, about 5 to 6 months a year. So, imagine how little is getting done. There's a lot more to this good woman. Please research her qualifications. And, if you get a chance to read this, please consider voting for for Judge Lewis. But, notice on the ballot that her name comes after Mark Martin, even though she should have been first. The boys rigged it somehow to put Martin first. Partisan Politics is alive and well in NC.

Tills killed Equal pay for NC women

Am truly Democrat but the bunch of LIES you are trowing into this campaign Shame on all of you how much are you all getting pay for the lies or what deal did you made . How can you put you head on the pillow at night.very very disscusted with the democratic party. I see how much you love your childrens. In the white house the workers are not getting equal pay . Where the hell you getting your your information. Shame SHame inall of you

Post new comment

You may enter comments here to publicly respond to this article. If you are having trouble posting your comment, please contact help@southernstudies.org.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.