dark money
So-called "dark money" plays an increasingly important role in funding climate science denial efforts.

Study finds shift to 'dark money' in climate denial effort

By Douglas Fischer, The Daily Climate

The largest, most-consistent money fueling the climate denial movement are a number of well-funded conservative foundations built with so-called "dark money," or concealed donations, according to an analysis released Friday afternoon.

The study, by Drexel University environmental sociologist Robert Brulle, is the first academic effort to probe the organizational underpinnings and funding behind the climate denial movement.

It found that the amount of money flowing through third-party, pass-through foundations like Donors Trust and Donors Capital, whose funding cannot be traced, has risen dramatically over the past five years. 

In all, 140 foundations funneled $558 million to almost 100 climate denial organizations from 2003 to 2010.

Meanwhile the traceable cash flow from more traditional sources, such as Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, has disappeared.

The study was published Friday in the journal Climatic Change.

"The climate change countermovement has had a real political and ecological impact on the failure of the world to act on global warming," Brulle said in a statement. "Like a play on Broadway, the countermovement has stars in the spotlight  -- often prominent contrarian scientists or conservative politicians – but behind the stars is an organizational structure of directors, script writers and producers."

"If you want to understand what's driving this movement, you have to look at what's going on behind the scenes."

Consistent funders

To uncover that, Brulle developed a list of 118 influential climate denial organizations in the United States. He then coded data on philanthropic funding for each organization, combining information from the Foundation Center, a database of global philanthropy, with financial data submitted by organizations to the Internal Revenue Service.

Figure1-550According to Brulle, the largest and most consistent funders were a number of conservative foundations promoting "ultra-free-market ideas" in many realms, among them the Searle Freedom Trust, the John William Pope Foundation, the Howard Charitable Foundation and the Sarah Scaife Foundation.

Another key finding: From 2003 to 2007, Koch Affiliated Foundations and the ExxonMobil Foundation were "heavily involved" in funding climate change denial efforts. But Exxon hasn't made a publicly traceable contribution since 2008, and Koch's efforts dramatically declined, Brulle said.

Coinciding with a decline in traceable funding, Brulle found a dramatic rise in the cash flowing to denial organizations from Donors Trust, a donor-directed foundation whose funders cannot be traced. This one foundation, the assessment found, now accounts for 25 percent of all traceable foundation funding used by organizations promoting the systematic denial of climate change.

A call and e-mail Friday night to Donors Trust was not returned.

Matter of democracy

In the end, Brulle concluded public records identify only a fraction of the hundreds of millions of dollars supporting climate denial efforts. Some 75 percent of the income of those organizations, he said, comes via unidentifiable sources.

And for Brulle, that's a matter of democracy. "Without a free flow of accurate information, democratic politics and government accountability become impossible," he said. "Money amplifies certain voices above others and, in effect, gives them a megaphone in the public square."

Powerful funders, he added, are supporting the campaign to deny scientific findings about global warming and raise doubts about the "roots and remedies" of a threat on which the science is clear.

"At the very least, American voters deserve to know who is behind these efforts."

* * *

The Daily Climate is an independent, foundation-funded news service that covers climate change. Find us on Twitter @TheDailyClimate or email editor Douglas Fischer at dfischer [at] DailyClimate.org

So-called "dark money" plays an increasingly important role in funding climate science denial efforts.
Appreciate this post? Please donate & share below.
Reddit »

People Referenced:


confirmed and scary

This research confirms the investigation by the Guardian last year. This time it's peer reviewed.

For me, the scariest thing about the anti-science public relations campaign is that it seems designed to create mental disability. Talk to a really committed climate science denier. You'll find he's emotionally invested in some ideology that doesn't offer any mechanism for fixing the problems discovered by climate science. Environmental regulation offends his sense of "free market" justice, or God's in charge and we'd incur His wrath by interfering, or some similarly crazy thing. Information which conflicts with the ideology threatens the victim's self identity. The mind raises automatic, unconscious defenses against ego-threatening information. It's incomprehensible, or it seems incongrouously funny, or it provokes such rage that the victim can't think about it.

If you ever wondered why your high school earth science makes no sense to your friend who listens to Limbaugh and Beck all day, well that's why. The "talking points" developed by the "institutes" (public relations firms) identified in the research seem designed specifically to strengthen the denier's ego defense against the modern scientific understanding of the issue.

30 years of needless CO2 panic is a war crime

The scientific consensus has NEVER been "will be" a crisis just "could be" a crisis and you remaining believers didn't even know what it was you were agreeing on?

YOU can't tell kids it WILL be until science does.

*Find us just one single IPCC warning that agrees beyond "could be" a crisis.*

Post new comment

You may enter comments here to publicly respond to this article. If you are having trouble posting your comment, please contact help@southernstudies.org.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.